Monday, February 22, 2010

Pagan Holidays

Question: What do you say to people that say that Christmas and Easter are pagan holidays?

Response: There are some great comments and insights in the comment section. Be sure to check those out! I side with those comments that talk about the importance of how we use the holidays, not where they originated. Many churches have Harvest Parties to give an alternative to Halloween. I don't see any difference between that and "redeeming" the other holidays. I think Paul's teaching on eating meat sacrificed to idols would apply here: "So then, about eating food sacrificed to idols: We know that an idol is nothing at all in the world and that there is no God but one. For even if there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth (as indeed there are many “gods” and many “lords”), yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we live. But not everyone knows this. Some people are still so accustomed to idols that when they eat such food they think of it as having been sacrificed to an idol, and since their conscience is weak, it is defiled. But food does not bring us near to God; we are no worse if we do not eat, and no better if we do. Be careful, however, that the exercise of your freedom does not become a stumbling-block to the weak."

I also think that using the holidays as an expression of our faith is a good thing. It gives a cultural opportunity to talk about spiritual concerns.

Dan Ver Woert has some interesting comments, as well that are worth investigating! Maybe it is the pagans who are copying us!
Check out Ruthie Oberg's comments, too.

Lastly, the Assemblies of God has published a paper in their Perspectives section that deals with this subject. You can read it at http://ag.org/top/Beliefs/sptlissues_holidays.cfm

Monday, February 8, 2010

Artificial Intelligence

QUESTION: Suppose we use genetic manipulation to insert genes into the DNA of Dolphins that allow greater intelligence and speech. Suppose then that these genetically-engineered dolphins become self-aware. Would these dolphins have a soul? When does a creature or being cross the line from non-sentient to sentient? Does crossing that line garner the being a soul? This question could apply to Artificial Intelligence and even to children.

My Response: Scripture teaches that man is a 3-part being: body, soul and spirit. What biblically distinguishes man from animals is that man was the only creature that God made a "living soul," indicating there is a significant difference between the animal and human soul. That difference is further clarified in understanding that the spirit is unique to man. Man is a living soul because he has a spirit that is eternal.

Intelligence and speech are functions of the mind, which is part of the soul. However advanced man may make animals, or artificial intelligence, he has no ability to impart a spirit into a non-spiritual being. Genetic engineering holds both promise and problems for the future. I do not, however, believe that there is any way man can move an animal or a machine into the realm of spiritual reality.

What do you think?